Rants from the Ballmer Peak rss feed

Whitespace goto fail

UPDATE: GCC6 will warn about misleading indentation, but don't tell that to reddit's experts because you know, they parse source code looking at braces instead of indentation. Maybe they aren't human and reddit posts are generated by sentient C compilers? Oh, and look what happens if you turn that warning into an error? Yup, C just got 0wned as an indentation sensitive language. LOL, so much for braces. Seriously, they are not for humans.

Recently I fixed the following interesting code in an Android application I wrote. According to source control it had survived undetected for about eight months until it manifested as a runtime crash:

if (null == savedInstanceState) {
        if (null != this.item && null != this.item.url)
} else {

The culprit of the bug was of course the addition of the set_sparta_kook() call to the previously existing lines of perfectly working code. Can you see now what the problem was? Yes, lack of beloved braces. Here's the fixed code:

if (null == savedInstanceState) {
        if (null != this.item && null != this.item.url) {
} else {

Welcome to a variant of goto fail. It's not the first time I've written such bugs, but they don't come often. I don't think I've made more than five in my whole life. Still, far too many for my taste.

What was particularly interesting is not how I could write this (distractions or tiredness can explain pretty much everything) but how I could not fix this immediately despite reviewing it carefully. Let me explain: it took me several minutes of looking at the source code, actually not figuring out what was happening and then using a debugger to step through the lines and think "wait a second, why is the program execution running through visible_web().loadUrl(this.item.url); in first place when the condition should be preventing that?".

I'm so used by now to reading properly indented code that no matter how many times I looked at this code I would not catch the missing braces. The typical patch to such problems is of course a coding convention. You can see this reflected as one of the promoted comments in the article I linked to earlier:

a_v_s Ars Scholae Palatinae

This is one of the reasons I always use {} even with single statement conditionals.

True. But you know what else could have prevented this bug without requiring a horrendous coding convention difficult to validate/enforce? Having a language which doesn't use braces and instead uses whitespace indentation like Eero or Nim do.

Whitespace indentation? How can you program in such a lame language?

Syntax anachronisms

Braces, or just about any other start/end block delimiter, are an anachronism and only add clutter and useless bike shedding. The key to understanding this is how I wasn't able to understand the actual meaning of the code which is pretty obvious to the compiler. After years developing, braces (or whatever you have in most of the programming languages designed without taste) are simply noise. They don't add any value to the source code. They are just a tedious necessity for the compiler, because frankly, humans won't use them. If you remember the first time you drove a car vs how you drive it several years later the difference is the same: the first time you pay attention to everything. Not only everything is new (oh, a vertical sign! Hi!) but you actually paid extreme attention because a mistake could lead to a terrible error. Years later you can concentrate only on the important things and don't freak out at every little detail you can see behind the driving wheel.

Unfortunately most people defending programming languages with braces don't get it and instead provide lame arguments. My favourite lame contra argument is that you can't easily copy/paste code between windows, web browsers, or Notepad, I guess, because the indentation will be messed up. It highly amuses me how often this argument comes up in religious battles because the people backing it must be using programming tools from the past, where automatic indentation is such an impossible technical feat. Or maybe programmers able to only copy/paste code really need these crutches, since they will leave the source code in a state which compiles but is unreadable to anybody who is not a compiler.

This argument also forgets another simple fact: it's highly unlikely that copying and pasting code somewhere else won't require changes anyway. Maybe you will need to change variable names, or remove some lines you don't need. Or if you actually care about source code, you will indent the code to your coding convention, modify the symbols to be CamelCase or snake_case, change private/instance variables to have a different prefix (m, _, m_, F, …), etc. Whatever lines of code go into any of my source files, even those which come from my own projects, have to pass an initial visual style inspection. And in the inspection I performed I simply forgot about the braces. Why? Because they are useless to human eyes, completely discard able.

You could really hear my facepalm in the whole building when I read on a forum discussion that somebody preferred programming languages with braces because their blog system screws up formatting for literal blocks. Seriously, if you come up with such quality arguments you should be neutered to prevent lowering humanity's intelligence average with your offspring (and the developers of your blog tools too).


Language designers should know better that adding braces for code blocks that are going to be indented anyway due to code conventions is detrimental because they distract programmers with a needless task, but we can still see new languages enforcing braces (like Kotlin or Swift). I suspect the real reason why these new languages keep them is to appease the hordes of users of the language they try to replace. It is such a shame we have so much trouble accepting change, even when it is for the better.

Remember, the argument for having braces is that you are such a horrible person that you will never indent or care about the style of your code and therefore prefer to have a crutch that frees you from having taste, and lets you dump foreign code into your own to leave it however it falls.

XKCD: code quality

See the article index or browse articles by tags: languages , programming , java , design .
Published on: 17/04/2015 23:37. Last update: 10/01/2016 18:41. rss feed
Copyright 2016 by Grzegorz Adam Hankiewicz.
Generated with ipsum genera. Look at the source code.